White House Escalates Clash with Harvard Over Alleged Antisemitism, Defends International Student Ban

 

The White House intensified its confrontation with elite academic institutions on Friday, publicly rebuking Harvard University for what it called “an environment steeped in antisemitism and apologism for terrorism,” following the administration’s controversial decision to revoke the university’s ability to host international students under the federal Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP).

The move, which impacts thousands of foreign students currently enrolled at Harvard, marks an unprecedented escalation in a months-long standoff over campus protests and the federal government’s response to perceived radicalism at major universities.

Administration’s Justification

White House Press Secretary Allison Crane delivered a scathing critique during Friday’s briefing.

“This administration will not stand by while federally funded institutions harbor hate,” Crane said. “Harvard’s failure to protect Jewish students and its permissive stance toward those glorifying violence have compelled us to act decisively. Revoking SEVP certification is not just a bureaucratic decision—it’s a moral imperative.”

According to officials, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reviewed “numerous incidents” dating back to October 2023, when protests against the Israeli military campaign in Gaza intensified across campuses nationwide. Harvard was singled out after several student groups issued statements that critics say echoed rhetoric associated with terrorist organizations.

A senior DHS official, speaking on condition of anonymity, stated that the department found “a sustained pattern of administrative tolerance toward extremist activism.” The official emphasized that while freedom of speech remains constitutionally protected, universities bear a responsibility to prevent speech from escalating into targeted harassment or incitement.

Reaction from Harvard

Harvard President Dr. Claudine Gay issued a sharp rebuttal late Friday, calling the administration’s move “an unconscionable attack on academic freedom and international scholarship.”

“To punish students—many of whom are neither Jewish nor Palestinian, and who have no connection to the political turmoil in the Middle East—for the actions or inactions of university leadership is a betrayal of American values,” Dr. Gay wrote in an open letter to the Harvard community. “We will exhaust every legal avenue to reverse this unjust measure.”

The university confirmed it would file for an emergency injunction in federal court, seeking to stay the enforcement of the SEVP revocation while litigation proceeds.

Divided Political Reaction

The decision has sparked fierce debate on Capitol Hill. Senator Rick Delgado (R-TX), a prominent critic of higher education institutions, praised the move.

“For too long, elite campuses have been breeding grounds for radical ideology under the guise of progressive thought,” Delgado said. “This action sends a clear message: no federal benefits for those who shelter hate.”

Conversely, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), whose state is home to Harvard, condemned the action as “a dangerous abuse of executive power designed to chill dissent.”

“Let’s be clear: this is not about protecting students—it’s about punishing criticism of U.S. foreign policy,” she said.

Implications for International Students

The SEVP certification allows universities to enroll international students on F-1 and M-1 visas. Without it, Harvard cannot issue the documentation necessary for foreign students to obtain or renew their visas. Students currently in the U.S. will be forced to transfer, change visa status, or depart the country.

For many, the announcement came as a shock.

“It’s like we’re collateral damage in a political war,” said Samira Al-Masri, a second-year Ph.D. student from Jordan. “I came here to study climate science, not to be caught in a proxy battle over Middle Eastern politics.”

The university estimates that nearly 15% of its student body is composed of international students. In an internal memo obtained by The Crimson, Harvard’s international student office warned that students on expiring visas could be subject to removal within 60 days if alternative arrangements aren’t made.

Legal Experts Weigh In

Legal scholars are divided over whether the administration's actions will stand in court.

Professor Martin Feldstein, a constitutional law expert at Yale, called the decision “legally dubious and politically provocative.”

“The government has wide latitude in immigration matters, but using visa policy to penalize an institution for protected speech—even offensive speech—is constitutionally fraught,” he said.

Others, like conservative legal analyst Brooke Tanser, argue that the move is within the administration's purview.

“The SEVP program is a federal benefit, not a right,” Tanser said. “If a university is fostering an environment that DHS deems unsafe or incompatible with U.S. policy interests, that’s within the scope of review.”

Broader Cultural Battle

The episode is the latest flashpoint in a broader cultural conflict between the Biden administration’s successor and liberal academic institutions. Since taking office, President Donald Trump—returning to the White House after his 2024 reelection—has made “patriotic education” a centerpiece of his agenda, clashing frequently with universities over curricula, speech codes, and DEI initiatives.

Observers say the clash over Harvard signals a new phase in that battle—one that may impact not only university governance but America’s global academic standing.

“International students come to the U.S. because of its reputation for academic freedom and excellence,” said Dr. Priya Natarajan, an education policy expert at Georgetown University. “What happens next will determine whether that reputation survives.”

---